103 F3d 121 United States v. Jessup

103 F.3d 121

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ricky JESSUP, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-7211.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1996.
Decided Dec. 13, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, West Chester, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jessup, Nos. CR-92-72-F; CA-96-321-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED