46 F.3d 1151
Richard GREENLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-3139.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 4, 1995.
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Before McWILLIAMS, BARRETT and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Richard Greenlee appeals the district court's dismissal of his claims, which the court construed as including employment discrimination, violation of constitutional rights, personal injury and/or property damage. Plaintiff does not allege any specific errors on appeal. After reading plaintiff's brief and reviewing the record, we are satisfied that the district court accurately summarized the facts and correctly applied the law. We therefore AFFIRM for substantially the reasons stated in the district court Memorandum and Order entered March 31, 1994.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470