930 F2d 28 Pasha v. County of Orange R a

930 F.2d 28

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Ali Asghar PASHA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF ORANGE, State of California, California State Bar
Association and California State Justice
Department, James R. Tipps, A Law
Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-55939.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 4, 1991.*
Decided April 11, 1991.

Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Ali Asghar Pasha appeals the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). For the reasons set forth in the district court's oral ruling of June 18, 1990, we affirm.

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3